Cambrige AS and A Level Accounting Notes (9706)/ ZIMSECĀ Advanced Accounting Level Notes: Reapportionment of service costs no interwork
- In the the example found here we looked at how to allocate and apportion overheads using bases and an overhead analysis sheet
- We have already looks at the theory of overhead absorption here
- We have also looked at allocation and apportionment here
- We have also looked at the theory of how to calculate overhead absorption rates (OARs) and why
- Now we will look at how we deal with a case where there is a service department
- As explained in the introduction the whole point of absorption costing is so that products can absorb a fair share of overheads
- In a simple set up where there are just production departments (production cost centres) this is simple
- Costs are apportioned and allocated among different departments, the total for each department is used to create an OAR which is used to absorb costs
- For example if a labour hour based OAR is calculated we as shown here, products absorb costs depending on how much time they spend in a certain department
- Where there are service departments it becomes necessary to distinguish between:
- Production cost centres-these are centres that actually produce the products for example the assembly and finishing departments
- Service cost centres-these work for the production departments and provide services to one another (inter-work) for example the maintenance department repairs machinery in both the production departments as well as the canteen. On the other hand maintenance workers eat in the canteen
- All service cost centre overheads must be transferred to production centres
- Thus all production overheads for the period are shared between the production cost centres alone
- This way they can be absorbed by units produced
- In this example we will show how service centre costs can be reapportioned in a case where there is no inter-work between the service departments
The Question
Patoking is a furniture store in the capital city. For the year 20×8 the following production overheads were anticipated:
Overhead item | $ |
Factory rent | 20 000 |
Factory heat | 5 000 |
Processing Department supervisor | 15 000 |
Packing Department-supervisor | 10 000 |
Depreciation of equipment | 7 000 |
Factory canteen expenses | 18 000 |
Welfare costs of factory employees | 5 000 |
Total Overheads | 80 000 |
- The following additional information is also provided
Base | Processing Department | Packing Department | Canteen Department |
Space in cubic metres | 50 000m3 | 25 000m3 | 5 000m3 |
Carrying Amount Equipment | $300 000 | $300 000 | $100 000 |
No. of Employees | 50 | 40 | 10 |
Required
- Allocate and apportion production overhead costs amongst the three departments using a suitable basis
- Reapportion the service centre costs
Solution
- First we allocate and apportion the overheads as usual
- The explanation for the solution below can be found here
Overheads | Apportionment Basis | Processing | Packing | Canteen | Total |
Factory Rent | Space | 12 500 | 6 250 | 1 250 | 20 000 |
Factory Heat | Space | 3 125 | 1 563 | 312 | 5 000 |
Supervisor Wages | Allocation | 15 000 | 10 000 | - | 25 000 |
Depriciation | Carrying Amounts | 3 000 | 3 000 | 1 000 | 7 000 |
Canteen | Allocation | - | - | 18 000 | 18 000 |
Welfare | No. of employees | 2 500 | 2 000 | 500 | 5 000 |
Total | 36 125 | 22 813 | 21 062 | 80 000 |
- Once this is done it is time to reapportion the service centre costs
- Since there is no inter work among the service departments ( in this case we really have just one department) the costs can be reapportioned to production cost centres only using a suitable rationale
Overheads | Apportionment Basis | Processing | Packing | Canteen | Total |
Factory Rent | Space | 12 500 | 6 250 | 1 250 | 20 000 |
Factory Heat | Space | 3 125 | 1 563 | 312 | 5 000 |
Supervisor Wages | Allocation | 15 000 | 10 000 | - | 25 000 |
Depriciation | Carrying Amounts | 3 000 | 3 000 | 1 000 | 7 000 |
Canteen | Allocation | - | - | 18 000 | 18 000 |
Welfare | No. of employees | 2 500 | 2 000 | 500 | 5 000 |
Total | 36 125 | 22 813 | 21 062 | 80 000 | |
Reapportionment of canteen costs | No. of employees | 11 701 | 9 361 | (21 062) | |
Total after reapportionment | 47 826 | 32 174 | ------ | 80 000 |
- Number of employees is the most suitable base here as the more employees the more they eat so the processing department clearly benefits more from the canteen
- After this step Overhead Absorption Rates for each department can then be calculated
To access more topics go the ZIMSEC Advanced Level Accounting page
To access more topics go to the Cambridge AS/A level page